FAQ 2026

it is 13.7 meters high, from the ground to the bottom edge of the bridge on the side of the yachting club

If you’re considering a permanent bridge to connect the project site to the peninsula where the Academic Yachting Club Belgrade is located, you’ll need to account for boat clearance to ensure safe navigation.

🧭 Minimum Clearance Height

While there is no single fixed number applicable to all locations on the Sava River, recent bridge projects in Belgrade (e.g. the New Sava Bridge) have been designed with a main span clearance of approximately 9 to 12 meters above the high water level, depending on the navigational profile and expected vessel types. [New Bridge...dge in ...]

For smaller boats and recreational sailing (as is typical near the Yachting Club), a minimum vertical clearance of 6 to 7 meters is generally considered sufficient. However, this depends on:

• The type of boats using the marina (e.g. sailboats with masts)
• Seasonal water level variations of the Sava River
• Flood risk and historical high water marks

📚 Recommendations

• Refer to the Sava River Navigation Manual published by the International Sava River Basin Commission for technical guidance: Manual on Sava River Navigation [PRIRUČNIK...IJEKE SAVE]
• Consider designing a movable bridge (e.g. swing or lift bridge) if you want to ensure full flexibility for marina operations.
• Avoid disrupting the protected ecological corridor along the riverbank — any bridge design should minimize impact on the shoreline and natural habitat.

For the purposes of the Architecture Student Contest, students are not required to strictly follow Serbian national or municipal building codes. Instead, you should rely on:
- European and international best practices
- Contest Task guidelines
- Saint-Gobain Sustainable Construction principles

This includes:
- Minimum room sizes, ceiling heights, daylight and ventilation ratios: Use international standards (e.g. EN norms, WHO recommendations, Passive House guidelines).
- Canteen and kitchen hygiene/safety: Refer to general EU food safety and hygiene principles.
- Accessibility: Apply barrier-free design principles (e.g. ISO 21542 or similar).
- Fire safety: Follow basic international fire safety principles (e.g. minimum two exits, fire compartments, non-combustible materials).
- Thermal and acoustic performance: Use the performance targets provided in the Contest Task (e.g. U-values, airtightness, acoustic insulation).

Yes, there is reliable data available on the variation of water levels of the Sava River in the vicinity of Belgrade, including the project area. Here are a few recommended sources:

📊 Where to find water level data

1. Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia (RHMS)
   Provides daily, monthly, and historical water level data for the Sava River in Belgrade.
   ➤ RHMS Hydrology Portal [Republic H...ava 66 ...]
2. Sava HIS (Hydrological Information System)
   Offers real-time and historical water level data across the Sava River Basin, including Belgrade.
   ➤ Sava HIS Real-Time Data [Sava HIS R...-Time Data]
3. DAHITI – Satellite Altimetry Database
   Provides water level time series from satellite data for the Sava River.
   ➤ DAHITI Water Level Database [Sava, Rive...l Time ...]
4. Sava GIS Geoportal
   Includes hydrological layers and flood risk maps for the Sava River Basin.
   ➤ Sava GIS Portal [Sava GIS Geoportal]

🧭 Design Implications

Please keep in mind that the riverbank is part of a protected ecological corridor, and any design near the water should:

• Respect the natural shoreline
• Avoid excavation or major alteration
• Consider seasonal water level fluctuations and flood risks

The bridge that will be converted into a pedestrian zone is the one with a metallic structure that passes over the Brodraskka Street (towards the East of the site).

Please check: https://architecture-student-contest.saint-gobain.com/edition-2026-belgrade

Please check the contact section in the website: https://architecture-student-contest.saint-gobain.com/contacts

All the information for the 2026 edition is on the website: 

https://architecture-student-contest.saint-gobain.com/edition-2026-belgrade 

Also, please contact the Saint-Gobain country leader and your university professor for any additional information.

The question of water levels in Belgrade is quite interesting, though there is no precise answer. Back in the 1960s, an embankment was built in the area of New Belgrade, right next to our location, which made it possible to develop a large part of the district. Before that, the area was sandy terrain and often flooded.

All the attached information and the sketch of the Sava riverbed were collected from the website of the Hydrometeorological Institute in Belgrade. 

The area where our location is situated is not specifically protected in this regard. We also don’t have any information about the reference zero point at the site. It’s worth noting that this is currently a sand depot supplying construction sites across Belgrade, using sand taken from the river.

I hope the attached data will help provide an overview of the situation on the ground. For the purposes of the competition, an approximation is assumed.

Informations from the official site:

Water Level Characteristics of the Sava River at Belgrade

This section presents an overview of the historical water level regime of the Sava River at the Belgrade gauging station, based on long-term observations conducted by the Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia (RHMZ). The analysis covers a representative observation period of more than 30 years and includes historical minimum and maximum recorded water levels.

Observation Period and Data Source

Systematic water level measurements at the Belgrade – Sava hydrological station have been continuously recorded since 1972, providing a reliable long-term dataset suitable for hydrological and engineering analyses.

Extreme Water Levels

• Absolute maximum water level:
  738 cm, recorded on 16 April 2006, representing the highest water level observed at this station and associated with major flood conditions.
• Absolute minimum water level:
  –61 cm, recorded on 25 November 1986, measured relative to the local gauge zero, indicating an extreme low-flow condition.

Monthly Water Level Statistics (1972–2024)

The long-term dataset allows the derivation of characteristic monthly minimum, mean, and maximum water levels, reflecting both seasonal variability and hydrological extremes.

Month	Minimum (cm)	Mean (cm)	Maximum (cm)
January	3	280	512
February	25	291	562
March	61	329	718
April	55	373	738
May	123	350	654
June	143	315	651
July	58	261	648
August	51	223	441
September	26	211	470
October	21	220	575
November	–61	245	594
December	–42	278	513

Hydrological Regime and Variability

Analysis of the recent 30-year period confirms pronounced seasonal and interannual variability:

• High-water conditions typically occur during spring, driven by snowmelt and intensive precipitation in the upstream catchment area. The most significant flood event in the observed period occurred in 2006.
• Low-water conditions are most frequently observed during late summer, autumn, and winter, often associated with prolonged dry periods.

Engineering Relevance

• Water levels exceeding approximately 600–700 cm indicate critical high-water conditions and are relevant for flood risk assessment, river training works, and hydraulic structure design.
• Water levels below approximately 50–100 cm represent severe low-flow conditions, which may affect navigation, water intake structures, and ecological flow requirements.

 

The red line represents the maximum water level, and the blue line represents the minimum, which statistically indicates that in the Belgrade area the river does not overflow its banks. The left side of the sketch would be the most similar to our location, although the slope toward the water is somewhat gentler.

The following comments reflect the on-site conditions. Students are encouraged to understand that this is a competition without super strict technical or regulatory requirements. In particular, given the current regulatory status of the area, the city’s proposals are not defined in detail and should be considered as general guidance rather than fixed constraints.

- It is acceptable and encouraged for cycling infrastructure to extend.The competition emphasizes integration with the Belgrade Linear Park. Your proposal should demonstrate how Plot 46 connects to the wider urban cycling network. While you should respect the functional designations of the "Planned Land Use" file, designing the "logical continuation" of ramps into adjacent public zones is necessary for a coherent mobility strategy

- Earthworks and Regrading: Within Plot 46: You have full architectural freedom to perform regrading or create embankments as part of your landscape and building concept. In Adjacent Areas: Earthworks should be minimal and nature-based. You must avoid heavy concrete embankments that could disrupt the riverbank's permeability or the protected habitat. Using "soft" landscaping to manage the 5–8% slopes is preferred to maintain the "Green Corridor" characte

- Vehicular Access to Plot 46: Vehicular access should be interpreted as restricted and secondary to pedestrian/cyclist flow. Access should ideally utilize the existing technical/service paths indicated in the site documentation. The vision for the area is a "Green/Blue Corridor," so any proposed vehicular road should be designed as a "shared space" or a low-impact driveway that does not sever the continuity of the Linear Park for pedestrians.

- Parking Requirements: There are no specific minimum numbers of parking spaces dictated in the Contest Task. However, you should follow these sustainability principles:
-- Prioritize Soft Mobility: Given the "Sports Hub" nature and the focus on the Linear Park, parking should be kept to a functional minimum (e.g., for staff, delivery, and persons with reduced mobility).
-- Context: Acknowledge the planned public parking nearby; your project does not need to solve the city's parking needs, only the essential requirements of the new facility and the Yachting Club.

Your focus should be on the connectivity of the site. Ensuring the bridge and ramps are technically feasible (5–8% slope) is part of the architectural challenge. As long as these structures are integrated into a sustainable landscape that respects the ecological corridor, extending them is a valid design choice.

1. Which information should be prioritized? You should prioritize Figure 28 and the provided DWG files (such as "planned use land.dwg") over current Google Earth imagery. - The Reason: As noted in the FAQ, "The city’s proposals are not defined in detail and should be considered as general guidance rather than fixed constraints." However, for the purpose of the competition, the provided vector data represents the intended urban framework that Saint-Gobain and the City of Belgrade want you to address. - Design Freedom: The organizers explicitly state that this is an "idea-based competition." If the provided road network creates a functional conflict with your concept, you are encouraged to propose a logical "architectural and landscape" solution to resolve it. 2. Does Figure 28 show the current situation or future plans? - Figure 28 includes future plans. Specifically, it reflects the "Planned Land Use" (Plan detaljne regulacije), which envisions: - The reconstruction of the old railway bridge into a pedestrian and cycling zone. - New cycling and pedestrian paths connecting the riverfront to the wider Belgrade network. - Potential modifications to the "Brodarska" road access points. 3. Should you assume excavation or level changes for the railway? - No, you should not assume large-scale excavation of the elevated railway. - Preservation of Infrastructure: The Task Brief describes the "refurbished old railway bridge" as a key link to the Belgrade Waterfront and Ada Ciganlija. - Clearance Constraints: The FAQ   confirms that the railway bridge has a clearance height of 13.7 meters from the ground to the bottom edge. This suggests that the infrastructure remains elevated. - Design Strategy: Instead of excavating, your design should focus on integrating the levels. The FAQ mentions that "earthworks or regrading (embankments) are permitted... to achieve the required elevations for the bridge and ramps". You should design ramps or landscape features that transition from the ground level of Plot 46 to the elevated pedestrian/cycling level of the former railway. Technical Summary for Your Proposal: - Treat Figure 28 as the "Vision": Align your masterplan with the suggested connections shown there. - Use the 13.7m Clearance: This is the fixed vertical constraint for any connection to the old railway bridge. - Assume Adaptive Reuse: The railway is being repurposed, not removed or lowered.

Please check the contact page: https://architecture-student-contest.saint-gobain.com/contacts

The license to OneClick LCA can be found within the OneClick LCA platform. It will be available upon the 1st training session schedule in October.

• The SG SAVEI 2023 version currently available on the website is only compatible with SketchUp 2023.
• Later versions of SketchUp (2024 or 2025) are unfortunately not compatible with the SG SAVEI 2023 plugin, which is the likely cause of the errors you encountered.

Recommended Course of Action: use SketchUp 2023 for your model, as this is the version fully compatible with the current SG SAVEI 2023 plugin.

• The SG team is currently finalizing the SG SAVEI 2025 version. This new version will be compatible with SketchUp 2025. However, it is not 100% finished yet.

The weather file for Belgrade is in the ASC 2025 page: 

https://architecture-student-contest.saint-gobain.com/sites/architecture-student-contest.saint-gobain.com/files/documents/weather-file.zip 

Please refer to the Contest Task (last modified September 12, 2025) for updated information on the site to be considered for the new construction. The plot assigned for the new construction is N. 46.

Hello,

There will be a new Contest Task to be shared with the local Saint-Gobain leaders this week (16/09/2025). This version of the document will clarify the new scope for the new construction.

Plot 46, will be the only plot to be considered for the new construction. The program of the athlete accomodation should be located in the specified plot. The connectivity with nearby areas is to be conceptual, as a future proposal. 

While Belgrade’s territorial planning documents do not specify a fixed setback distance from the Sava River for all projects, the Architecture Student Contest 2026 provides the following recommendations:

• By the low the protected area on the riverbank is between 10 and 50 meters depending on the area, location, function distribution. In this area there are no prescribed regulations.
• Maintain a buffer zone of vegetation and green space between any built structures and the river edge.
• You may propose lightweight, non-invasive structures (e.g. viewing platforms, decks) that respect the ecological boundary.
• Avoid any permanent construction within the narrow coastal zone adjacent to the river.

This range is the guideline for the competition. 

• 200 is the ideal capacity for such a building and guarantee a continuous use throughout the year and optimize costs (use, maintenance, etc).
• While 200 is the stated maximum, a compelling and well-justified design that slightly exceeds this number could be considered by the jury, especially if it enhances the overall quality of the project while remaining within the other constraints. Students should aim for a number within the specified range but be prepared to defend their design choices if they deviate.

The athlete accommodation proposed in the Contest Task is primarily designed for temporary stays for athletes participating in:

• National or regional competitions
• Training camps or concentrations
• Short-term programs or events

The building is not intended to function as a long-term residential facility (e.g. dormitory or permanent housing). However, your design can include flexibility in room types and services to accommodate different durations of stay — for example:

• Single rooms for short-term individual athletes
• Double rooms for teams or shared use
• Accessible rooms for inclusive design

The goal is to create a comfortable, functional, and sustainable environment that supports athletes during their time in Belgrade, while remaining adaptable to different sports and seasonal use.

There is already available all received information on bicycle infrastructure.  If anything comes in the meanwhile, we will send it or attach .

The only official site information and data are contained within the provided DWG file.

1. Could you please provide all the site dimensions?
The project site for new construction is located in Zone 46, which is part of the former cement factory area. The exact perimeter is defined in the “Planned Land Use” document available on the Contest website. Please refer to that file for precise dimensions and boundaries

2. Is it possible to design near the riverfront shore?
Yes, you may design near the riverfront, but not on or into the riverbank itself. The site is part of a protected ecological corridor, home to sensitive species like the Pygmy Cormorant.

3. The Contest does not require adherence to a specific certification system, but encourages alignment with international sustainability standards. The contest task emphasizes: energy efficiency, embodied carbon carlculations, circularity, health & well-being, use of Saint-Gobain solutions

4. While there is no fixed national standard, typical floor-to-floor heights in Serbia are:
Residential buildings: ~2.8 to 3.0 meters
Public/commercial buildings: ~3.2 to 3.5 meters
For design flexibility, you may assume 3.2 to 3.4 meters as a reasonable average for your project.

At this stage, there is no new update to the Contest Task that includes a detailed program with specific surface areas for each space. The current version of the Task intentionally leaves room for flexibility and interpretation, allowing students to define the areas and zones based on:

• The functional needs described in the Task (e.g. athlete accommodation, cafeteria, training spaces)
• Best practices in architectural programming
• Sustainability and comfort criteria (e.g. daylight, ventilation, accessibility)

You are encouraged to make reasonable assumptions and justify your choices in your design narrative. If any updates or additional documents are released, they will be published on the Contest website and communicated via your Saint-Gobain Local Leader.

Yes it is in scale meters or centimeters

Thanks for your question — it’s a good one and we’re happy to clarify.

You’re right that Zone 46 is defined as a “sports area” in the General Urban Plan. However, for the purpose of the Architecture Student Contest 2026, the athlete accommodation is considered part of the broader category of sports-related facilities and complexes. This includes not only training and recreational spaces, but also support functions such as housing for athletes, changing rooms, cafeteria, etc.

So yes — you should follow the Contest Task as your main reference. The accommodation building is fully aligned with the intended use of the zone as defined for the competition. The General Plan provides context, but the Contest Task defines the scope and expectations for your project.

For the purposes of the Architecture Student Contest, students are not required to strictly follow Serbian national or municipal building codes. Instead, you should rely on:
- European and international best practices
- Contest Task guidelines
- Saint-Gobain Sustainable Construction principles

This includes:
- Minimum room sizes, ceiling heights, daylight and ventilation ratios: Use international standards (e.g. EN norms, WHO recommendations, Passive House guidelines).
- Canteen and kitchen hygiene/safety: Refer to general EU food safety and hygiene principles.
- Accessibility: Apply barrier-free design principles (e.g. ISO 21542 or similar).
- Fire safety: Follow basic international fire safety principles (e.g. minimum two exits, fire compartments, non-combustible materials).
- Thermal and acoustic performance: Use the performance targets provided in the Contest Task (e.g. U-values, airtightness, acoustic insulation).

For the purposes of the Architecture Student Contest 2026, excavating or reconfiguring the riverbank to create a gulf or inclusion is not permitted. The site is located within a protected ecological corridor, which includes sensitive habitats such as the wintering zone of the Pygmy Cormorant, a protected bird species.

The Contest Task specifically mentions that:
- The narrow coastline area must not be disrupted.
- A buffer zone of protective greenery should be maintained along the river edge.
- Any intervention near the river must respect the natural ecosystem and biodiversity.

You are encouraged to enhance the connection to the river through respectful design strategies — such as decks, platforms, or green transitions — but without altering the natural shoreline or excavating into the riverbank.

At this stage, the Architecture Student Contest 2026 does not provide an official cadastral map of the site.

What You Can Do

• Use the Zone 46 boundary as your main reference for the new construction area.
• You are encouraged to make reasonable assumptions based on the visual material and diagrams provided.
• If needed, you can expand the boundaries slightly in your proposal, as long as it is justified and respects the ecological and urban context.

If any additional cadastral or DWG files become available, they will be shared via the Contest website 

While the Contest Task does not explicitly prohibit underground construction, it’s important to note the following:

• The site is located in Zone 46, which includes shoreline land and is adjacent to the Sava River floodplain.
• The City of Belgrade’s climate adaptation strategy prioritizes flood protection, especially in low-lying areas like New Belgrade.
• The Contest Task encourages resilience to flooding, green infrastructure, and minimal disruption to the natural shoreline.
• However, to date, there are no known examples of anyone constructing a garage or any other underground structure that close to the river—especially in that particular part of the city.

🚫 Underground Parking
Given these constraints, we do not recommend designing underground parking or other deep excavations near the riverbank. Instead, consider:
- Above-ground or semi-underground parking solutions that are elevated or integrated into the landscape.
- Permeable surfaces and green parking zones to support drainage and ecological goals.
- Flexible and modular parking layouts that can adapt to seasonal water level variations.

If you choose to explore underground elements, make sure to justify them clearly in your design narrative and demonstrate how they address flood resilience, ecological sensitivity, and safety.

The Contest Task does not impose a fixed percentage for built-up, paved, or green areas. However, given the site’s location in a protected ecological corridor along the Sava River, and the emphasis on sustainability and biodiversity, we recommend using best practices from European sports and recreation facilities as a reference.

A general rule for areas near the river is a ratio - 40% built-up area and 60% non-built (green) space.

Here are typical ranges observed in sustainable sports complexes across Europe:
- Built-up area 15–30% Includes buildings, indoor facilities, locker rooms, etc.
- Paved surfaces 10–20% Includes walkways, parking, courts, plazas — consider permeable materials
- Green/open space 50–70% Includes lawns, trees, buffer zones, sports fields, ecological corridors

These ratios are inspired by projects such as:

• Great Forest Stadium in Debrecen, Hungary: ~25% built-up, ~60% green space, ~15% paved [https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/6/714]
• LEED-certified sports complexes: often aim for ≥50% green/open space to meet sustainability goals [https://biofit.io/news/sustainable-leed-certified-gyms-health-clubs-spas]
• Urban waterfront parks in NYC: prioritize flood resilience and green buffers, with built-up areas kept below 30% [https://www.nycgovparks.org/planning-and-building/planning/resiliency-plans/flood-resiliency]

🗂️ About the “4_...” Frozen Layers in the DWG File
The “planned land use.dwg” file includes several layers, some of which are frozen (like the ones labeled “4_...”). These layers represent additional urban planning elements — such as future infrastructure, zoning overlays, or reserved corridors — that may not be part of the current active development but are part of the broader urban vision.

You are not required to strictly follow these frozen layers. However, they can be used as reference to understand potential future developments or constraints. If they conflict with your design logic, you are free to propose alternatives, as long as they are well justified and respect the ecological and urban context.

🚧 Access, Parking & Logistics
You are encouraged to propose new connections — including streets, bicycle paths, pedestrian routes, and service access — especially if the current layout limits functionality.
Key Points:

Parking: You may assume shared use of nearby parking areas, but it’s best to designate your own parking zones within the site for clarity. Loading/Unloading: For sports equipment, restaurant deliveries, and other logistics, you can areas to:
- Propose dedicated service access points
- Include drop-off zones or loading bays
- Use shared infrastructure if justified and clearly explained

🛠️ Flexibility in Urban Layout
This is an idea-based competition, and students are free to reinterpret the surroundings:
- You can retain, adapt, or redesign parts of the given urban plan.
- Your proposal should aim to enhance accessibility, sustainability, and user experience.
- Just make sure to explain your assumptions and decisions clearly in your project narrative.

There is no specific requirement to include accommodation for staff in the Athlete Accommodation program. However:

• You can include staff housing if it fits your concept and operational logic.
• If you choose to do so, a reasonable assumption would be to plan for 5–10% of the athlete capacity — that is, 5 to 20 staff members for 100–200 athletes.
• This could include coaches, medical staff, or facility managers, depending on your design.

Thanks for your detailed question! Here are the key clarifications:

1. Plot 46 Boundaries & Georeferencing

• Use the “Planned Land Use” file as the official reference for the design perimeter.
  Your georeferencing method using the Yachting Club peninsula is valid for aligning the files.
• The Katastarski Plan is useful for legal context but not binding for the contest (all the documentation is not fully synchronized).
  Plot 46 is considered to extend to the riverbank in the contest scope, but there is an ecological buffer zone to respect.

2. Ecological Corridor & Riverfront Design

• Maintain at least 10–15 meters of natural vegetation along the riverbank within Plot 46.
• Light, reversible structures (e.g. decks, platforms, piers) are allowed if they don’t disturb the soil or habitat.
• A pedestrian/cycling bridge to the Yachting Club is allowed if it’s elevated and doesn’t interfere with the protected strip.

1. What is “Cao 22”?

• “Cao 22” is not clear on the map, however, it does not appear to be of any relevance for the project. It might refers to a planned circulation axis in the urban zoning. If so, it is intended as a road, likely accessible to vehicles, and connects the two parking areas. You can assume it allows car access, but it may also include pedestrian and bike paths depending on your design.

2. Should we plan a parking zone?

• You are free to use the two parking areas shown in the DWG file. However, if your project requires dedicated parking (e.g. for athletes, staff, deliveries), you can add your own, especially for logistics and accessibility.

3. Is there a fixed location for the pedestrian bridge?

• Regarding the bridge or general access to the site and the yacht club itself, it is important to note that access from the peninsula is quite limited - narrow, occasionally restricted, and sometimes even closed. Therefore, the primary focus for access and connectivity should be directed from the site side.
• Nevertheless, there is no predefined location for a pedestrian bridge. Just make sure it’s ecologically sensitive and doesn’t interfere with the natural riverbank buffer.

4. Should athlete rooms have private bathrooms/kitchenettes?

• The room types (60–70% single, 30–40% double) are suggested. You can choose between private or shared bathrooms/kitchenettes, depending on your functional layout. Just make sure your solution is well justified and supports comfort and flexibility.

1️⃣ Fitness Center Accessibility
The Fitness Center is primarily intended for resident athletes (100–200 occupants). However, since the project promotes a community-oriented Sports Hub, you are free to propose a mixed-use gym open to the public — if it fits your concept and is well justified.

2️⃣ Design Capacity
It's up to you based on your proposal. Take into account the feasibility of usage for a "public gym" and not to over design. That is design it considering the peak use.

3️⃣ Managing Mixed Use. If shared, you can propose:

• Separate access routes
• Time slots for athletes vs. public
• Zoning within the gym (e.g. private recovery area vs. public fitness zone)

This flexibility allows you to tailor the gym to your overall design strategy.

The Contest Task mentions environmental concerns due to the site's industrial history, but there is no specific confirmation about soil contamination.

While this may not be a critical factor in an idea-based competition, it is worth noting that the site has not been subject to aggressive industrial activity in recent years. For some time now, it has primarily served as a “concrete base,” where sand from the river is utilized in the production of concrete for various construction projects throughout the city and as a "parking" for building machines, equipment and vehicles.

Since this is an idea-based competition, you are not required to conduct a technical soil analysis. However, you are encouraged to:

- Acknowledge the site's industrial past in your concept
- Propose design strategies that could address potential contamination (e.g. raised foundations, phytoremediation, limited excavation)
- Consider adaptive reuse or ecological restoration as part of your sustainability approach

The athlete accommodation is not designed as an Olympic Village or tied to a specific annual competition. Instead, it’s part of a flexible, multi-use Sports and Recreation Hub. Its purpose is to host:

• Resident athletes for training camps, national events, or short-term stays
• Amateur and professional teams
• Potentially, visiting athletes during community or regional sports activities

You are free to define the operational model in your proposal — whether it’s seasonal, year-round, or event-based — as long as it aligns with the overall concept of a sustainable and inclusive sports campus.

The surface area mentioned in the Contest Task refers to the original full site (approx. 120,000 m²), which was later reduced for the purposes of the competition.

The updated Plot 46 is the blue-shaded area shown in the “Planned Land Use” document. However, the exact surface area in square meters of this reduced plot is not explicitly stated in the brief.

If you need a precise number, we recommend:
- Measuring the area using the DWG file (e.g. in AutoCAD or similar software)
- Using the blue perimeter as the official boundary for your calculations

Thanks for your question! Here’s what you need to know about Plot 46 and existing structures:

- Official Reference: Use the DWG files provided in the Contest documentation as the official design base. They reflect planned land use and zoning, not necessarily the exact current state after partial demolitions.
- Date & Accuracy: The DWG date is not specified, and Google Maps or Earth images may also be outdated. Both can be used for context, but the DWG defines the perimeter for the competition.
- Existing Buildings: There is no requirement to keep any buildings from the former cement factory, as the land use will change. You are free to demolish, transform, or reuse structures as part of your concept.
- Legend & Structure Types: There is no official legend indicating which elements are permanent or removable. Some clues can be gathered from the drone view video provided in the Contest resources.
- Design Approach: The site is intended to be redeveloped, so demolition is expected. However, you are encouraged to integrate circularity principles, such as strategies for construction and demolition (C&D) waste reuse or material recovery.

The information shared is the only available information obtained for the site. But there are some online tools : 

- https://en-ng.topographic-map.com/map-c9zh3q/Belgrade/
- https://www.floodmap.net/?gi=792680

-This sand is intended for use in cement production, and may be utilized or handled in any manner required for the project.

-Regarding the existing buildings, it should be noted that from the outset they were classified as temporary structures, and they have remained in that status for several decades. Consequently, any interventions, modifications, or removals may be carried out.

Please see previous questions related to conection between Yatch Club and Plot 46.

Please note: Regarding the bridge or general access to the site and the yacht club itself, it is important to note that access from the peninsula is quite limited—narrow, occasionally restricted, and sometimes even closed. Therefore, the primary focus for access and connectivity should be directed from the site side.

If a new conection is made is should serve only pedestrian s and cycling only.

The required site setback for the project is primarily defined by the ecological buffer zone along the river.

Riverbank setback: Please see previous question on riverbank distances suggested.

General site : The contest task doesn't provide explicit urban planning setbacks (eg 3m - 5m possible) from adjacent roads or plots. Consider also the distance to the railway.

The parking space is recommended to be designed within Plot 46 (Zone A), but you are encouraged to use vertical solutions to save land area and minimize the implantation of parking on other plots.

On-Site Focus: The required parking capacity should respond to the design of Plot 46, as using land outside the project site is not recommended for the purpose of the competition but students are free to propose if well justified.

Avoid Basement Parking: Due to the river proximity and high water table, constructing basement parking is strongly discouraged as it is not technically recommended or sustainable.

Recommended Solution: Multi-Level Parking: To prevent consuming a large percentage of the site proposing an above-ground, multi-level parking structure is the best strategy. 

Serbian fire safety design, while following European norms, often requires fire-resistance periods that are higher (e.g., EI90 instead of EI60) for compartment-separating elements, especially in buildings with multiple independent units like the proposed accommodation/hotel.

For student work or conceptual-level studies, fire-resistance requirements should not be the primary concern at this stage. More focus should be devoted to aspects of spatial organization, user comfort, functionality, natural light, ventilation, and overall architectural logic. Fire-safety performance can be appropriately addressed at a later phase, once the fundamental design parameters have been established.

1. Yes, the outdoor sports fields should be primarily proposed within Zone 46. Zone 46 is the designated site for the new construction, including the Athlete Accommodation and the core sports facilities. This must include the necessary outdoor sports fields (for example tennis, basketball, track and field areas) that are essential for the training component of the hub depending on your proposal. You can propose additional volumetry in other plots depending on your design proposal.

2. The instruction to propose conceptual solutions for the second floor—that have no connection to the club's activities—is a way to address the ownership and non-club-use status of that specific level. You are renovating the club's space, but the second floor is outside their mandate. You might propose a conceptual solution for this space to demonstrate its potential for future public or civic use, reflecting the overall goal of community integration.

The original plot for the new construction has been simplified to zone 46. Please refer to the Contest Task and FAQ for more information.

The reason the 360 videos do not show Parcel 46 is that the plot designated for the New Construction is currently occupied by a temporary cement factory operation.

Therefore, you can disregard any existing temporary equipment or buildings on Plot 46 in your design. For eference on boundaries, you must rely on the Site Plans and Zoning documents (DWG/DXF files). The videos and external tools like Google Maps/Earth should only be used to understand the broader visual context, such as the riverfront, the adjacent Yacht Club, and the surrounding urban environment.

The athlete accommodation facility is designed as a flexible, multi-use Sports and Recreation Hub intended mainly for local use, but might be used by visiting international visitors.

Your design should therefore cater to a diverse range of users, ensuring the accommodation is functional, sustainable, and adaptable for athletes from various backgrounds and disciplines.

The bridge is to be considered fixed. 

You should also respect and allocate appropiate distance for safety reasons in your design.

You are free to propose creative ideas, including floating structures, provided you account for the site's ecological and functional sensitivity. While not forbidden, you must consider that a "splav" or similar floating structure could obstruct the flow of boats arriving at or departing from the Yacht Club, potentially restricting maritime mobility. Furthermore, you should address potential noise pollution if the structure is used for late-hour services, as this could disturb the protected habitat. Always remember that your primary focus must remain on the renovation of the Yacht Club and the development of Plot 46.

The concept of a floating structure (raft/splav) is common at a nearby location, adjacent to a residential area further along the river.Locally, almost all existing facilities are of a hospitality/food-and-beverage character, with only a few exceptions. The prevailing trend is a reduction in their number, and several years ago the number of floating facilities was reduced by more than half. 

Unless such a structure introduces a distinct added value or specific quality to the location, its installation should be carefully and critically evaluated.

Students are encouraged to propose conceptual ideas for the repurposed bridge as it integrates into the overall urban vision. As the bridge will most likely be converted into a pedestrian and cyclist path, adding sports or recreational activities can successfully complement the "Sports Hub" and Yacht Club. These additions should help weave the project into the Belgrade Linear Park; however, ensure that these conceptual ideas do not overshadow the main design mandate, which is centered on Plot 46 and the Yachting Club building.

A high-level, conceptual vision that could be of interest as a potential direction for future development, rather than as an integral part of the project itself.

Students have freedom to design the new building. While specific numerical limits are not explicitly stated for the new building, teams can evaluate alignment with the surrounding urban landscape along the riverbank.

We don't have plans for the rest of the city, but online you can check the following sites: 

• GeoSrbija (Official National Geospatial Data). This is the most reliable source for topographic maps, orthophotos, and parcel data for the entire city. Website: https://geosrbija.rs/ 
• Belgrade Land Development Public Agency (Beoland). They provide specific urban planning documents and cadastral maps for Belgrade. Website: https://www.beoland.com/ 
• OpenStreetMap (OSM) Data . https://www.openstreetmap.org/ 

There is not available drawings or plans for the concrete factory.

The flooring of the existing concrete plant is typically high-strength industrial reinforced concrete.  Students can propose recycling this material. Crushing the existing flooring is a valid strategy to align with the contest's focus on the circular economy and minimizing environmental impact. It can be reused for sub-bases, drainage, or as a landscape element.

1. Plot 46 Boundaries & Georeferencing

- Use the “Planned Land Use” file as the official reference for the design perimeter.
- The Katastarski Plan is useful for legal context but not binding for the contest.
 

The files were provided by the City. You can use any GIS software (https://qgis.org/). You can try to download and install QGIS (free mapping software), then open the .qgz file. This will automatically load all maps, routes, and data files together.

Your detailed architectural design must prioritize Plot 46 (New Construction) and the Yachting Club (Renovation). You are encouraged to include master plan–level ideas that address areas beyond Plot 46 and the Yachting Club. Proposals that indicate conceptual programs (like the pedestrian/cyclist bridge, sports hubs, or green corridors) in adjacent zones are welcome, as they demonstrate a holistic urban approach and better integration with the Belgrade Linear Park.

 

The notation "1 5000" in the Rhino/DWG data should be understood as the intended plotting scale (1:5000) for the master plan context. To confirm, you can measure a known object (like a roadway width, which is typically 3–6 meters) to verify that 1 unit equals 1 meter

 

The competition rules and the site’s specific constraints restrict the proposed bridge to pedestrians and cyclists for several reasons:

• Ecological Protection: The site is located within a protected ecological corridor and a wintering zone for the Pygmy Cormorant. A car bridge would require a much larger footprint, heavier permanent foundations, and more significant structural intervention, all of which are listed under "What to Avoid" to prevent disrupting the sensitive riverbank habitat.
• Sustainable Mobility Goals: One of the primary objectives of the contest is to promote sustainable mobility and reduce dependence on private vehicles. The vision is to integrate the site with the Belgrade Linear Park, which focuses on "green/blue" corridors for pedestrians and cyclists.
• Access Constraints: The road leading to the Yachting Club on the peninsula is narrow, occasionally restricted, and must not be intervened. Adding car traffic to this side would conflict with the existing infrastructure and the club's recreational character.
• Turning the peninsula into an island is not permitted

There is no restriction forcing you to use a campus-style layout or a single building. Students are free to propose the architectural typology that best fits their concept. You may design a single, consolidated "hub" building or a series of smaller, "campus-style" pavilions.
 

While there is no "hard" rule that says you cannot exceed four floors, teams need to evaluate the specific urban and ecological constraints of the site:The technical documentation and FAQ emphasize that the new construction should align with the "low-rise structures along the riverbank." In the context of Belgrade's urban planning for this zone (the Linear Park).

For the purposes of the Architecture Student Contest 2026, excavating or reconfiguring the riverbank to create a gulf or inclusion is not permitted. The site is located within a protected ecological corridor, which includes sensitive habitats such as the wintering zone of the Pygmy Cormorant, a protected bird species.

The Contest Task specifically mentions that:
- The narrow coastline area must not be disrupted.
- A buffer zone of protective greenery should be maintained along the river edge.
- Any intervention near the river must respect the natural ecosystem and biodiversity.

You are encouraged to enhance the connection to the river through respectful design strategies — such as decks, platforms, or green transitions — but without altering the natural shoreline or excavating into the riverbank.

An idea alternative idea is to think about a sustainable drainage system (rain gardens, and/or manage water on-site with breaking integrity of the riverbank)

 

While the official contest documentation does not provide specific bathymetric data, you can find detailed river depth and navigational information for the Sava River in Belgrade through the following official and technical websites:

1. Plovput (Directorate for Inland Waterways of Serbia)
This is the most reliable source for official navigational charts.

What to look for: "Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC)" or "Paper Navigational Charts" for the Sava River.

Specific Area: Look for the charts covering km 0.0 to km 5.0 of the Sava River. The project site is located near the Ada Bridge (Most na Adi) and the Bežanija winter park (Bežanijski zimovnik). The depth of the Sava River averages between 5 and 10 meters and depends on the water level, season, and sediment deposition.

Website: plovput.rs

Here is the technical clarification based on the official FAQ and Task Brief: 1. Which interpretation is correct? Both interpretations are valid depending on your project's urban strategy. - The "Service-First" Approach: Many participants prioritize Plot 46 for "essential functions" (athlete housing, sports facilities) to minimize the building footprint and maximize the 60% required green space. - The "Integrated Capacity" Approach: If your design includes a multi-level or integrated parking solution, it is acceptable provided it does not violate the 40% maximum built-up area rule or infringe on the protected ecological corridor (10–50m from the riverbank). -  The competition encourages you to treat the City of Belgrade’s preliminary plans as general guidance, not fixed constraints. You have the freedom to redefine the parking layout if it improves the project's sustainability and "Multi-Comfort" performance. 2. Is a parking block mandatory within Plot 46? No, a dedicated parking block is not mandatory. The Task Brief and FAQs emphasize "sustainable urban mobility" and "decreasing dependence on private vehicles." You are free to organize parking differently, such as: - Decentralized pockets of parking to avoid large heat-island effects. - Shared parking with adjacent CAO zones (as suggested in FAQ Result #21). - Technological solutions: Proposing a "mobility hub" rather than a traditional parking lot. Note: Underground parking is strongly discouraged due to the high water table and flood risks associated with the Sava River. 3. Is the "Bus/Service-Only" strategy on Plot 46 acceptable? Yes, this is a highly recommended strategy. Given that the contest focuses on a Sports Resort where athletes arrive in groups: - On-Site Priority: It is architecturally logical to prioritize Plot 46 for buses, service trucks (for sports equipment like sailboats), and staff/ADA-compliant parking. - Visitor Off-Siting: Locating the majority of visitor parking in nearby designated urban zones (like the existing areas along Brodarska road) is a valid way to preserve the "tranquility of the river Sava" and meet the competition's ecological goals.

For the Architecture Student Contest 2026, parking capacity is determined by functional demand and  defined land-use ratios for Plot 46: 1. Land-Use Ratios. Your design should follow recommended site distribution: - Built-up area (15–30%): Buildings and indoor facilities. - Paved surfaces (10–20%): Walkways, parking, and courts. (Use permeable materials to minimize environmental impact). - Green/open space (50–70%): Lawns, trees, and ecological corridors. 2. Capacity & Strategy - Prioritize Group Transport: Since athletes arrive in teams, focus on bus parking and service truck bays (for sailboats/supplies). - Limit Private Cars: Provide only for staff and ADA accessibility. General visitor parking should be located off-site in existing city zones. - Manage Peak Demand: The site neighbors Ada Ciganlija, which attracts 100,000 to 300,000 visitors during summer weekends (Source: Task Brief, p. 9). Do not attempt to house this volume on-site; rely on the refurbished railway bridge and public transit instead. 3. Key Constraints - No Underground Parking: Strongly discouraged due to high water tables and flood risks near the Sava River. - Permeability: High-quality "green" parking solutions (like grass pavers) are preferred to support the site's ecological goals.

For the Architecture Student Contest 2026, the choice between an Olympic (50m) or Semi-Olympic (25m) pool depends on your architectural strategy and how you balance the site’s functional requirements. There is no strict mandate for an Olympic-sized pool. - Programmatic FitThe contest focuses on a Sports Resort and athlete accommodation. - Semi-Olympic (25m): This is generally considered sufficient for high-performance training, recovery, and recreational use. It is a more sustainable choice as it requires significantly less water, heating, and chemical treatment, aligning with the contest's emphasis on low-carbon and circular design. - Olympic (50m): Only propose this if your specific concept focuses on elite competitive swimming events. However, be aware that its larger footprint makes it harder to stay within the building occupancy limits and maintain the required green corridors.

For the Architecture Student Contest 2026, if your design for Building A consists of a campus or cluster of multiple buildings, you should follow this approach: Detailed Simulation for One Representative Building: You must perform and present detailed energy and comfort calculations (Thermal, Acoustic, Visual) for at least one primary or representative building of the cluster. This allows the jury to evaluate your technical proficiency and choice of Saint-Gobain solutions. General Strategy for the Cluster: For the remaining buildings, you do not need to provide individual full simulations. Instead, provide a general summary explaining how the other structures follow the same high-performance principles and how they interact as a system (e.g., shared energy sources or orientation strategies). Holistic Site Vision: Ensure your masterplan clearly indicates how the entire campus meets the overall sustainability goals, but keep the deep technical data focused on the "hero" building of your new construction lot. In short: Provide a detailed simulation for one main building as a technical proof-of-concept, and a qualitative overview for the rest of the campus.

1. Are these volumetric proposals mandatory, and do they affect jury evaluation?

• The volumetric proposals for complementary functions (such as water sports facilities, cafés, sports-related retail, or a sports museum) are not mandatory as fully developed buildings. However, they are strongly encouraged at a conceptual and volumetric level, as they help demonstrate:
  • Your understanding of the overall Sports and Recreation Hub vision
    How the Athlete Accommodation integrates into a broader, mixed-use campus
    The spatial logic, scale, and relationships between buildings, open spaces, and public functions
  • Their presence or absence will not be evaluated as a checklist item, but proposals that thoughtfully illustrate how these complementary functions could be accommodated tend to be stronger and more convincing from a masterplan and urban coherence perspective.

2. Can these volumetric proposals be located outside Plot 46 (e.g. Lots 43/44)?
 

• Yes. While Plot 46 (Zone A) is the only mandatory area for the new construction to be designed in detail (Athlete Accommodation and essential sports facilities), you are allowed to place conceptual volumetric proposals outside Plot 46, including in Lots 43/44 or other adjacent areas, if you choose to develop a wider masterplan vision. Key points to keep in mind:
  • Outside Plot 46, proposals should remain conceptual and volumetric only. They should not compete with or overshadow the detailed design required within Plot 46
    Any extension beyond Plot 46 must be clearly justified and consistent with the ecological and urban context

For energy simulations teams can use any software to that purpose, as indicated in the Contest Task.

Unfortunately, no additional DWG files are available.

🧭 What You Can Do

• Use GoogleMaps to estimate floor heights.
• You are encouraged to make reasonable assumptions based on the visual material and the building’s described functions.
• The building is relatively recent and modest in scale — likely two stories, with a typical floor-to-floor height of ~3.2 to 3.4 meters.
• You may estimate the overall building height to be around 9 to 10 meters, unless your concept proposes changes.

If any additional drawings (e.g. DWG, CAD, or sections) become available, they will be shared

 

We understand it can be challenging to start without precise architectural documentation. At this stage, the available plans for the Academic Yachting Club Belgrade are limited. The Contest Task includes:
- A general description of the building’s current use
- A few reference images and videos
- A basic program of spaces

However, detailed architectural drawings (e.g. DWG files, elevations, sections) and exact building heights have not been provided publicly. The building is relatively recent, but the Club has only shared partial documentation.

🧭 What You Can Do

• You are encouraged to make reasonable assumptions based on the visual material and the building’s described functions.
• For reference, a typical floor-to-floor height in Serbia for public buildings is around 3.2 to 3.4 meters.
• You may estimate the overall building height to be around 9 to 10 meters for a 2-story structure, unless your concept proposes changes.

Yes, it is permitted to intervene in or modify the façade of the Academic Yachting Club Belgrade as part of your renovation proposal. However, any intervention should:

- Respect the building’s identity and historical legacy
- Avoid disrupting the protected ecological corridor along the riverbank
- Be consistent with the overall vision of the Sports and Recreation Hub

For the Architecture Student Contest 2026, you are allowed to propose modifications and enhancements to the existing Yachting Club building — including reconfiguring internal spaces and adapting the façade. However, when it comes to increasing the built surface area or volume, there are important constraints to keep in mind:

🧭 What’s Permitted

• You may propose modest extensions or additions that improve functionality (e.g. decks, viewing platforms, lightweight structures).
• These interventions should be respectful of the ecological corridor and not disrupt the natural shoreline.
• The design should maintain the identity and scale of the existing building and integrate well with the surrounding landscape.

🚫 What to Avoid

• Major expansions that significantly alter the footprint or height of the building.
• Any construction that encroaches on the protected riverbank zone, which is home to sensitive species like the Pygmy Cormorant.
• Excavation or permanent structures within the buffer zone along the river.

In short, functional and sustainable enhancements are welcome, but large-scale volume increases should be avoided unless clearly justified and environmentally sensitive.

The Academic Yachting Club Belgrade is primarily focused on sailing — it's the oldest sailing club in Belgrade and has a strong tradition in competitive and recreational sailing, especially with its Optimist team (for youth aged 7–15). The club organizes sailing schools, training sessions, and national competitions.

As of now, there is no indication that the club engages in other sports disciplines beyond sailing.

 However, for the purposes of the Contest Task, you are free to propose complementary functions in the renovation — such as a gym, meeting spaces, or public areas — as long as they respect the club’s identity and the ecological context of the site.

OPTIMIST CLASS
This is a youth class of single-handed sailboats for sailors up to 15 years of age, recognized by the international sailing federation (ISAF), with its own association – IODA (www.optiworld.org). 

LASER CLASS
This is a racing class of single-handed sailboats for adult sailors, intended for recreational and high-level competitive sailing (OLYMPIC CLASS). Depending on the sail size, there are three Laser classes:

STANDARD (Olympic class for men), RADIAL (Olympic class for women), and Laser 4.7 (for boys and girls up to 18 years of age). Laser Class Website: www.laserinternational.org

FINN CLASS
This is an Olympic class of single-handed sailboats for adult sailors, intended for high-level competitive sailing. It requires a strong and technically well-trained sailor
Visit the website: http://sailing.org/iyruclass/fin.htm

M550 CLASS
This is a cruiser with a three-member crew belonging to the MICRO class (cruisers up to 550 kg)

RADIO-CONTROLLED MODELS
Marblehead Class. RC models in this class are 1.3 m long with mast heights up to 215 cm. The rudder and sails are controlled remotely.

We understand it can be challenging to start without precise architectural documentation. At this stage, the available plans for the Academic Yachting Club Belgrade are limited. The Contest Task includes:
- A general description of the building’s current use
- A few reference images and videos
- A basic program of spaces

However, detailed architectural drawings (e.g. DWG files, elevations, sections) and exact building heights have not been provided publicly. The building is relatively recent, but the Club has only shared partial documentation.

🧭 What You Can Do
You are encouraged to make reasonable assumptions based on the visual material and the building’s described functions.
For reference, a typical floor-to-floor height in Serbia for public buildings is around 3.2 to 3.4 meters.
You may estimate the overall building height to be around 9 to 10 meters for a 2-story structure, unless your concept proposes changes.

The reconstruction area for the Academic Yachting Club Belgrade is centered on the existing building footprint and its immediate surroundings. While the Contest Task does not provide cadastral coordinates or a detailed parcel map, the building is located on a narrow peninsula adjacent to the Sava River, and its limits are visible in the reference images and 360° video available on the Contest website.

Flexibility in Boundaries
We encourage students to propose expanded boundaries if they see it justified — for example, to improve accessibility, create public spaces, or enhance the club’s integration with the surrounding landscape. Just make sure any expansion:

- Respects the ecological sensitivity of the riverbank
- Is clearly explained and justified in your design narrative

Within the renovation of the Academic Yachting Club, you are allowed to propose new access points or modify existing ones, as long as:

- The changes respect the building’s structural constraints
- They enhance functionality, accessibility, or public integration
- They are clearly justified in your design proposal

You can also consider improving circulation for athletes, staff, and visitors, especially in relation to the riverfront and surrounding public spaces.

1) Can I change the main entrance on the ground floor?
Yes. you are allowed to reposition or redesign the main entrance, as long as it improves accessibility, circulation, or functionality and respects the building’s structural constraints. however, it is important to keep in mind that the lower level of the building currently functions as a garage for boats and equipment. On the upper levels, I do not foresee any significant limitations

2)  Can I change the position of the stairs (exterior and interior)?
The internal staircase is positioned to provide access throughout the building. While its placement is not ideal, relocating it would significantly compromise the building’s structural integrity and would require interventions that are not feasible. That said, the addition of supplementary staircases—either internally or externally—would not pose a problem.

You are not required to build a permanent pedestrian bridge between Plot 46 and the Yachting Club peninsula. The goal is to enhance connectivity, but the means are flexible.
So yes -  you can  propose a boat shuttle or ferry system for pedestrians and cyclists, as long as:

- It’s reliable and accessible
- It supports the daily use of the site (e.g. for athletes, visitors, staff)
- You clearly explain its advantages and limitations compared to a fixed bridge

Here are the clarifications for the renovation of the Academic Yachting Club:

1️⃣ Can I create a new projection or overhang beyond the existing eave line?
Yes — you may propose new projections or overhangs, as long as they are structurally feasible and respect the character of the existing building. These should enhance functionality or environmental performance, not completely alter the building’s identity.

2️⃣ If I keep the existing columns, can I modify beams, slabs, or stair foundations?
Modifications are possible, but it’s important to distinguish between:

• Reasonable reconstruction that improves functionality
• Design interventions that demonstrate creativity
• Excessive structural changes, which are neither desirable nor rational

The focus should be on preservation and enhancement, not full replacement. Alterations to structural elements should be limited and justified, prioritizing improved usability and sustainability.

3️⃣ Can I modify the façade or structure to add balconies or light wells?
Yes — you can rework façades and add elements like balconies or light wells, provided these changes are coherent with your renovation concept and respect the building’s context. The same principle applies: enhance without erasing the original identity.

4️⃣ What materials or modifications are allowed?
You can use new materials and propose updates to existing components. We encourage:

• Sustainable and locally available materials
• Energy-efficient upgrades
• Designs that improve comfort, accessibility, and durability

🔄 Flexibility vs. Preservation
The renovation task offers design freedom, but keep the renovation spirit: preserve a visible connection to the original structure. A good guideline is to maintain 30–50% of the existing building’s volume or structure, while adapting it to new uses and performance goals.

Accessibility is an important consideration, but the Contest Task does not mandate installing an elevator inside the Academic Yachting Club building. Here’s what you should keep in mind:

• The Elevator is Not Mandatory: You are not strictly required to install a heavy, structurally intensive elevator inside the small, existing Academic Yachting Club building.
• Emphasize Realism: Consider the "real necessity, complexity, and impact" of such a major intervention on a "pretty small club." Alternative solutions: External ramps or other inclusive design strategies are acceptable, provided they ensure reasonable access for people with reduced mobility.
   

Please see previous questions on renovation limits

Flexibility vs. Preservation
The renovation task offers design freedom, but the spirit of the project is renovation, not complete reconstruction. Aim to preserve a meaningful portion of the existing structure (around 30–50%) while improving functionality and sustainability. Interventions should balance reasonable reconstruction, enhancement of usability, and design creativity, avoiding unnecessary structural changes.

General Guidelines
You may reconfigure access points, modify circulation, and introduce openings or façade enhancements such as balconies or light wells, provided these changes respect the building’s character and structural logic. Use sustainable materials, prioritize energy efficiency, and consider circularity principles (e.g., reuse of construction and demolition waste). Physical limits are flexible, but maintain a visible connection to the original building.

Please check the existing 360 video for the Yatch Club. If we received more photos we will make them available.

Renovation: 
1. There's no information on the number of people training during the day. But you can assume between 20-30 athletes max at any given time.
2. The contest task doesn't provide a minimum number of sanitary fixtures. You could use EU / International building codes to dimension these facilities.
3. For the columns, assume a load-bearing structure made of concrete.

New Construction - outdoor
1. The Contest Task does not specify exact numbers or percentages for bus and car arrivals. You must justify your design based on the building's function. Given the facility is an Athlete Accommodation and Sports Hub, you should include a limited number of bus parking spots (e.g., 2–3) to handle multiple teams arriving for events or training camps.
2. The contest focuses on the land-based development of Plot 46 and the renovation of the Yachting Club. The existing floating structures (splav and houseboats) are external to the primary project site boundaries defined in the task. While you can neglect them, considering their aesthetic, function, and presence in your master plan can add contextual richness to your design.
3. You can extend the pathway, but you must respect the ecological buffer zone.

New Construction - Sports Facility
1. Yes, separate facilities are generally recommended. To maintain the security and privacy of the accommodated athletes ("hotel guests") and simplify the facility management,
2. They can be integrated, but access must be managed for security.
3. The recovery room should be private, while the multi-purpose room can be public.

1. For river elevations, you're encourage to check publicly available data from the Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia (RHMS): https://www.hidmet.gov.rs/eng/hidrologija/radio.php

See previous questions in regards to DWG. Please use the DWG file as the official base. If there are further discrepancies, teams are encourage to correct them based on logical assumptions  and clearly state your assumptions for the river elevation and geometry in your report.

The provided documentation for the Yacht Club renovation is limited (including basic floor plans but lacking detailed sections, elevations, and certain internal configurations like the mezzanine plan). No revised or complete floor plans are available.

Since the Contest Task permits interior reconfiguration of the existing building, you have the full flexibility to make design assumptions regarding the mezzanine level. You may choose to keep it, remove it entirely, reconfigure a new one, or select any other design option that best optimizes the building's new functionality, accessibility, and structural logic. You must clearly state and justify your assumption and final design choice in your project narrative.

Unfortunately, we do not have information regarding the technology or operational framework of the sailing club. Furthermore, we believe that the club itself has not developed such systems in accordance with its actual needs, as the facility was never fully completed from a construction standpoint, and all activities and usage are carried out individually and on an ad hoc basis, depending on immediate requirements. 

If the available recordings do not show elements of organized handling or structured operational processes, this almost certainly indicates that such systems do not exist. Accordingly, a proposal for organizational and/or technological solutions may be freely developed, to the extent considered relevant for the project.

The only documentation we have received is the material already provided. Any further detailed information may be reasonably approximated. Based on the available sketches and photographs, it is entirely feasible to perform an assessment that will certainly remain within acceptable tolerance limits and will not have a significant impact on the spatial/volumetric organization or the overall appearance of the space.

Please refer to pages 26-27 of the Contest Task.

Please refer to pages 26-27 of the Contest Task.

Gemini said

Gemini said

The Yachting Club building and its immediate surroundings (Zone B) must remain the primary focus of your proposed design. While you are permitted to redesign the harbor and introduce new walkable deck structures, these must be treated as complementary elements that do not overshadow the building's renovation.

It is essential that all deck structures follow the established sustainability principles: they must be lightweight, ecologically sensitive, and of a non-permanent character. This ensures minimal disruption to the natural shoreline and the protected ecological corridor while maintaining the flexibility required for a sensitive riverfront intervention.

Gemini said

The Yachting Club building and its immediate surroundings (Zone B) must remain the primary focus of your proposed design. While you are permitted to redesign the harbor and introduce new walkable deck structures, these must be treated as complementary elements that do not overshadow the building's renovation.

It is essential that all deck structures follow the established sustainability principles: they must be lightweight, ecologically sensitive, and of a non-permanent character. This ensures minimal disruption to the natural shoreline and the protected ecological corridor while maintaining the flexibility required for a sensitive riverfront intervention.

The Yachting Club building and its immediate surroundings (Zone B) must remain the primary focus of your proposed design. While you are permitted to redesign the harbor and introduce new walkable deck structures, these must be treated as complementary elements that do not overshadow the building's renovation.

It is essential that all deck structures follow the established sustainability principles: they must be lightweight, ecologically sensitive, and of a non-permanent character. This ensures minimal disruption to the natural shoreline and the protected ecological corridor while maintaining the flexibility required for a sensitive riverfront intervention.

• For the renovation building, team should consider the building and its surroundings, while respecting any pedestrian, boat access or other that exists.
• It's permitted to consider a connection between the two sites. The connection must be strictly for pedestrians and cyclists. It must ensure the Academic Yachting Club can still move boats in and out of the cove,

Your proposal should prioritize the Yachting Club building and Plot 46, but the conceptual connection and the landscape between them are vital for demonstrating a holistic urban vision.

Regarding boat decks and navigation, here is the condensed technical guidance:1. Deck Projection and NavigationThere is no specific maximum "meter" limit, but all water-based structures must follow these constraints: - Lightweight and Reversible: Decks must be non-permanent, wooden, or floating structures that do not disrupt the riverbank or the Pygmy Cormorant habitat. - Navigation Flow: Any projection must stay within the shoreline zone and not interfere with the official Fairway (shipping lane), typically located in the center of the Sava River. - Access Priority: Per the Official FAQ, primary access must be directed from the "site side" (Plot 46) because the peninsula access is narrow and unreliable. Any new bridge or connection to the club must be restricted to pedestrians and cyclists only. Typical Boat DimensionsDesign your docking facilities to accommodate the following recreational and athletic vessels: - Small Training Boats (Optimist): 2m length. Require low-profile floating docks for youth access. - Racing Sailboats (Laser/Finn): 4.2m to 4.5m}length. These are often manually launched via slipways. - Micro Cruisers (M550): 5.5 m length, weighing up to 550kg. - Pedestrian Shuttles: If proposing a water taxi instead of a bridge, these typically range from $8\text{ m}$ to $12\text{ m}$ in length. Recommendation: Use floating systems to adapt to the river's seasonal water level fluctuations ("tides") and ensure all materials align with Saint-Gobain’s sustainability and circularity standards.